logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 11. 09. 선고 2017두55336 판결
(심리불속행)법적 실체 있는 법인간 정상적 회계처리 등을 하였더라도 상품매출액 부풀리기 목적이라면 사실과 다른 세금계산서에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-35013 (2017.05)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2013west 4430 (Law No. 11, 2014)

Title

(1) Even if a legal entity has kept normal accounts, etc., the sales of the goods constitutes a false tax invoice if the purpose is to eliminate the sales of the goods.

Summary

(1)If, in the course of trading between legal entities with a substance of law, the sales of the goods are traded on an external basis for the purpose of uneasting the sales of the goods, even if the transaction was conducted with normal accounting, return of payments and payment of value-added tax, this constitutes a false tax invoice.

Related statutes

Article 6 (Supply of Goods)

Cases

2017du5536 The revocation of the disposition imposing value-added tax.

Plaintiff and appellant

○ Chemical Industry Corporation

Defendant, Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Imposition of Judgment

November 09, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the text on the grounds of appeal is examined.

The head of the agency shall not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal

B. Since the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act, the party involved in the appeal is dismissed.

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow