logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.25 2015고단4354
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and by a fine not exceeding 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On March 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October, 10 and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 17, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 22, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) took a bath to the taxi driver C while drunking around 00:20 on March 22, 2015; (b) took the Defendant’s cryp to the paper E box located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (c) took the Defendant’s cryp to the paper E box; and (d) took the Defendant’s cryp to the cryp of a bit of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bit of a bitch of a bitch of a bit

I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to open the door and to say, I would like to say, I would like to say.

It was difficult to avoid disturbance by reporting about about 40 minutes, such as "the report on the content of", etc.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to a very rough speech and behavior in a public office.

2. On March 22, 2015, around 00:54, the Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties filed a complaint to kill the Defendant as the current offender, such as the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, while avoiding the foregoing riot at the location of the aforementioned “1.”

In doing the bath theory of “,” etc., the act of assaulting the above FF’s left side buckbucks twice.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police box service and the lawful execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A report on investigation and a report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: The inquiry about the criminal history of the defendant, the text of the judgment (No. 642 highest of 15 highest of 642), and the application of statutes to the screen of the consolidated case (No. 15 highest of 642);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment).

arrow