logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.17 2018고단3066
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 600,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2018. 5. 5. 01:20 경 서울 서초구 C 앞 노상에서 ‘ 손님이 행패를 부린다’ 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 서초 경찰서 D 파출소 소속 경찰관인 E으로부터 귀가하라는 말을 들은 것에 화가 나 위 E의 오른쪽 무릎을 발로 2회 때리고, 같은 파출소 소속 경찰관인 F의 목 부위 근무 복을 손으로 잡아 낚아챘으며, 공무집행 방해의 현행범으로 체포되는 과정에서 발로 위 F의 몸통 부분을 1회 때리고, 위 E을 향해 발길질을 하는 등의 폭행을 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting duties and maintenance of order.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) on May 5, 2018, at around 01:40, the police officers working at the D police box located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G for the purpose of “(b) of opening weather” and “C(c).

The phrase "absing down", "absing down", "a bitching bitching bitching bitching son", "absing a sound, spiting a route on the police officer who passed by the defendant's side, and spiting spits on the floor of the police box several times, and 50 minutes of a disturbance, such as spiting spits,

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A H statement;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to the internal speech and behavior of the suspect on criminal duty) and a criminal investigation report (related to the evidentiary video by carrying out the on-site and police box);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing out of damaged photographs, CCTV images CDs and caps (up to 11 on a regular basis);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Determination of imprisonment with prison labor and fines for the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act shall be made against the crime of interference with the selective execution of official duties;

arrow