1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if all of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the statements in Gap evidence (including each number) submitted in the court of first instance were examined, it is justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of some contents as follows. As such, it refers to Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance is that there is no disciplinary action, and the second of the judgment, "In addition, the plaintiff's act of misconduct of this case does not constitute a crime of intentional indecent act, and it does not constitute a crime of indecent act by negligence, and the plaintiff was not punished due to the act of misconduct of this case, and the defendant did the dismissal disposition of this case against the plaintiff without reflecting the reasons for mitigation according to public services.

The third day below the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as the "B Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers)" as the "B No. 1 through 6 (including paper numbers)".

From the fourth session of the judgment of the court of first instance, the first fifth order is as follows.

(5) According to Article 2 of the Rules on Disciplinary Action, etc. against Public Educational Officials, Article 2 and [Attachment Table] of the Rules on Disciplinary Action, etc. for Public Educational Officials provides that the dismissal shall be made in the case of sexual assault "where the degree of non-competence is severe, gross negligence, or the degree of misconduct is weak, and there is intention." According to Article 4 (1) and (2) of the same Rules, the Disciplinary Committee may reduce disciplinary action if the person for whom a disciplinary decision has been requested has contributed to a certain degree.