1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: the court’s explanation of this case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion to “sexual manipulation” and the addition of the judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A. Additional Determination

Article 2 [Attachment Table] of the Rules on Disciplinary Measures, etc. for Public Educational Officials, the purport of the plaintiff's assertion is to determine the violation of the criteria for disciplinary measures. The plaintiff's assertion falls under "where the degree of non-violation is serious, the degree of progress, or the degree of misconduct is weak, or the degree of gross negligence is weak," and at the same time, "where the degree of non-violation is serious, the degree of misconduct is weak, or the degree of misconduct is weak, and the degree of gross negligence is weak," among "other violation of dignity" of the criteria for disciplinary measures is subject to disciplinary measures for 2013, "other violation of dignity" of the above criteria constitutes "where the degree of non-violation is serious, the degree of misconduct or gross negligence is weak," and the plaintiff's dismissal of the above disciplinary measures for the first time after his/her reduction of salary constitutes "where he/she was subject to disciplinary measures for the first time after his/her reduction of salary or gross negligence."