logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.01 2017누44376
소청심사청구 기각결정 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court concerning this part of the instant disposition are as follows. The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. The "Budget and Settlement of Accounts" in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be corrected as "Budget and Settlement of Accounts", and the plaintiff's argument that is emphasized in the trial of the court of first instance shall be as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment as to the argument that the plaintiff emphasizes in the trial of the court of first instance as mentioned in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this shall be cited in accordance with

H. On January 18, 2016, the Disciplinary Committee resolved to dismiss the Plaintiff. On January 29, 2016, the president of Cuniversity notified the Plaintiff that he/she will be dismissed on February 29, 2016, and the main text thereof.

Details are as follows:

1. Grounds for disciplinary action;

(a) Violation of Article 64 of the State Public Officials Act and Article 30 of the Regulations on the Personnel Management of Faculty Members under Article 55 (1) of the Private School Act - Where a person holds office as a director of D for a long time without the president’s permission - Where a person holds office as a substantial manager - Where a person conducts research services as a person in charge of research of D;

(b) Violation of Article 56 (Duty of Good Faith) of the State Public Officials Act under Article 55 (1) of the Private School Act - Part 11 (Duty of Good Faith) shall attend a school only on a monthly day during which classes are given, the rest of the days shall work D in order to neglect education, guidance, and research for students by taking charge of all duties within the company, and shall not participate in the operation of the department

2. A disciplinary decision.

A. 1. A. (a) of attached Table 1 which applies among the rules on disciplinary action, etc. of public educational officials: Where the degree of misconduct in profit-making business or in breach of the duty to hold concurrent offices is serious (Article 8) - Removal or dismissal 2).

Paragraph: ① If the degree of misconduct in breach of the duty of good faith is serious and intentional (paragraph (1) - removal, ② If the degree of misconduct in breach of the duty of care is serious and intentional (paragraph (3) - removal, dismissal and dismissal) Article 29 (Overseas Tour) of the Regulations on the Personnel Management of Teachers.

arrow