Main Issues
Whether the approval of the housing site development plan is administrative disposition against the implementer of the scheduled housing site development area and the housing site development project (affirmative)
Summary of Judgment
The Minister of Construction and Transportation's designation of the prearranged area for housing site development under Article 3 of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act and approval of the housing site development plan for the executor of the housing site development project by the Minister of Construction and Transportation under Article 8 of the same Act shall be subject to administrative disposition, because the location, area, details of rights, etc. of the land to be developed by the public notice of such disposition are specified, the right to execute the housing site development project is established after the project operator is granted the right to accommodate under the condition that it will go through certain procedures, and the rights and legal interests of the specific individual are regulated individually and specifically,
[Reference Provisions]
Articles 3 and 8 of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act, Article 2 of the Administrative Litigation Act
Reference Cases
[Plaintiff-Appellant] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Domin, Attorneys Park Jae-soo and 1 other, Counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-Appellee)
Plaintiff-Appellant
Plaintiff 1 and 2 others, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant Kim Jong-woo
Defendant-Appellee
The Minister of Construction and Transportation and one other, the defendants et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant
Intervenor joining the Defendant
Korea National Housing Corporation’s Intervenor’s Intervenor (Attorney Kim Dong-sik, Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 91Gu6162 delivered on September 27, 1991
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
We examine the grounds of appeal.
1. The Minister of Construction and Transportation’s designation of the planned area for housing site development under Article 3 of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act and approval of the housing site development plan for the executor of the housing site development project under Article 8 of the same Act are specified by the public notice of the said disposition, so the right to execute the housing site development project after which the project executor is granted the right to expropriate under the condition that the area of the land to be developed, the right to expropriate should go through a certain procedure, and as notified, the rights and legal interests of a specific individual are individually and specifically regulated, each of the above dispositions by the Minister of Construction and Transportation shall have the nature of the administrative disposition (see Supreme Court Decision 80Nu105, Mar. 9, 1982; Supreme Court Decision 86Nu256, Aug. 19, 196; each of the above dispositions by the government is merely merely an internal plan publicly notified to the citizens, and there is no ground for appeal to the effect that it is not an administrative disposition.
2. In Article 3(2) of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act, when the Minister of Construction and Transportation intends to designate a planned housing site development area, he shall hear the opinion of the head of the local government concerned and then refer to the opinion of the head of the local government concerned, and it is interpreted that the above provision should be disposed of according to the opinion of the head of the local government concerned. Thus, there is no reason to interpret that the above provision should be disposed of by driving away from the opinion of the head
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jong-ho (Presiding Justice)