logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.01.18 2017고단3276
점유이탈물횡령등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two months and by imprisonment for not more than two months with prison labor for the crimes of Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;

A. On August 31, 2017, the Defendant acquired a copy of KB citizen physical card, which was lost by the victim B (27 years old) in the 601 and the subway W (27 years old) from the Manam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

B. On August 31, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) around August 21, 2017, found one copy of the corporate bank C’s physical card (credit number D) lost by the victim C (the age of 23) at the same place as the above paragraph (a).

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

(c)

On September 1, 2017, the Defendant acquired a copy of the victim E (tax age 45)’s resident registration certificate that was lost by the victim E (tax age 45) in the 100 Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Sinnam-si, the Sinnam-si, the Sinnam-si.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

(d)

On September 8, 2017, the Defendant, on September 10, 2017, acquired a new credit card lost by the Defendant F (V, 29 years old) on the part of the victim F (V, 29 years old) and the platform platform of the subway station, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-gu.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

E. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant acquired 280 copies of the Victim G (20 tax) and one card number H (credit number H) from a company bank on the part of the Plaintiff’s member of the G (20 tax) under the Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, Sinnam-si, Sinnam-si, Sinnam-si, Man-si, Sin-si.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of each victims over five times.

2. The use of computers and other computers;

arrow