logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.13 2017고단4654
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

A victim shall have one vegetable (Evidence No. 6) and one vegetable (Evidence No. 7) that has been seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 4654"

1. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;

A. A. Around December 2016, the Defendant acquired a head of library membership certificate, which was owned by the victim D, in the vicinity of the C located in Osan City, Osan-si around December 2016.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

B. From December 2, 2016 to January 2017, the Defendant acquired one wall that was lost by a victim’s name in the vicinity of the Osan-si Station, 59, from December 2, 2016 to January 2, 2017, where it is impossible to identify his/her market price.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

(c)

On February 2017, 2017, the Defendant acquired a smartphone 4 smartphone on the front side of the F bank near the Sinsan-si E market on February 2, 2017, which was owned by the Victim G, 300,000 won of the market value.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

(d)

On February 2, 2017, 2017, the Defendant, who acquired smartphones, found the victim H from around the Seocho-si E market in early February 2, 2017, 200 to acquire one smartphone.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

e. From February 2, 2017 to March 2, 2017.

arrow