logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.07.20 2016고정554
컴퓨터등사용사기미수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;

A. On August 12, 2015, the Defendant found one new card lost by the Victim G in front of the Won-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on August 12, 2015.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

In this way, the defendant embezzled the property that has escaped from the possession of the victim.

B. On September 2015, the Defendant found one copy of the Victim C’s KB National Card (H) in front of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-si.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

In this way, the defendant embezzled the property that has escaped from the possession of the victim.

(c)

On September 2015, the Defendant acquired one copy of the Victim D's National Card (I) in front of the Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

In this way, the defendant embezzled the property that has escaped from the possession of the victim.

(d)

On October 4, 2015 or October 5, 2015, the Defendant acquired one copy of the Victim E’s V card (J) in front of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

In this way, the defendant embezzled the property that has escaped from the possession of the victim.

E. On October 8, 2015, the Defendant found one copy of the Victim B’s Cash IIC card (K) in front of the Hancheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City F.m.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

In this way, the defendant embezzled the property that has escaped from the possession of the victim.

2...

arrow