A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 21, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for six months at the Seoggu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on December 21, 201, and on December 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Seog Daegu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on June 5, 2013, and the said sentence became final and conclusive on June 5, 2013, and the execution of the said sentence was terminated on October 14, 2013.

[Criminal facts] 2015 Highest 6469

1. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;

A. On May 2015, the Defendant found one of G2 mobile phones equivalent to KRW 600,000 at the market price of the victim C lost, from the distance of a lifeline near the subway Station located near the subway Station in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

B. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant, at around 02:00, found 4 cellular phones in front of the D Building in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and at around 800,000, the victim E lost its market value.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

(c)

On July 3, 2015, at around 03:00, the Defendant acquired one set of money in an amount equivalent to 400,000 won in the market price, including one credit card of a new bank owned by the victim F and two new bank physical card of a new bank owned by the victim F.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.