logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.10.23 2019고단3198
사문서위조등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person operating "D" in E in leisure time, and Defendant B is an external third village of E (cadastral disability 1) and F (cadastral disability 2) with intellectual disability 3.

The Defendants forged the application for the establishment of mobile phones and Internet in the above E/F name, and conspired to distribute the subsidies of the radio operator and profits from the disposal of mobile phones by using the phone name E/F to the employees of the radio operator who knew of the forgery, open the mobile phone in the E/F name, or open the Internet.

1. Forgery of private documents and uttering of private investigation documents in the name of E mobile phone;

A. From October 24, 2016, Defendant B forged Private Document: (a) entered Defendant A into the foregoing “D”; (b) written documents, such as the E identification card necessary for entering the mobile phone; (c) Defendant A entered Defendant A’s name in the subscriber name column, “E”, “H”, “H in the customer address column; (d) written in the customer address column column, “J (the mother of Defendant B); and (e) written in the J (the mother of Defendant B); and (e) written in the date of preparation column, “E” and “E”, respectively; and (e) written in the applicant column.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a mobile phone entry application in the name of E in relation to rights and duties for the purpose of exercising.

B. According to the above public offering, Defendant A sent one copy of the forged E mobile phone entry application form in the aforementioned document by facsimile as if the document was duly formed, at the time, and at the place, the date, time, and place specified in the above paragraph 1(a).

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use one copy of the application for joining a mobile phone in the name of E, which is a private document on the forged rights and duties.

2. Forgery of private documents and uttering of private investigation documents in the E-name Internet establishment application form;

A. Defendant B forged private documents on October 24, 2016

arrow