logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.03.13 2018고단2628
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 10, 2018, around 12:40 on January 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) forged private documents; (b) signed a new contract for mobile phone service (D) service in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (c) on January 12:40, 2018, the Defendant entered “E” in the applicant column by using an authorized printing machine on the application form for subscription to the radio service contract; (d) simple sales contract; (d) iPhone customer consent; (d) the application form for subscription to the radio service contract; and (d) the standard guide form for selective agreement; and (e) signed in writing that cannot be identified in the signature column

In the above C, the Defendant, as if he had duly formed a forged document in the above name, to C’s seller F, who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the private document in the name of E, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.

2. On January 10, 2018: (a) around 14:16, the Defendant forged private documents; and (b) around 14:16, at around 14:16, the Defendant: (a) signed an application form for admission of mobile phones (I) in the form of the mobile phone (I) located on the first floor in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating “E” in the applicant column by using a black pen; and (c) signing a signature that is illegible in the signature column

The Defendant, who was aware of the forgery in the above H, presented to H seller J a forged E application for membership as if it were a document duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the K subscription application in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant presented the forged L/C application at the time, place, as described in Paragraph 1’s date and time, and at the above place, and carried out as if he/she had a legitimate authority to open a mobile phone with E and deceptioned the Victim L/C corporation.

The Defendant opened a cell phone in the name of E from the victim and did not pay KRW 2,527,170 from February 2018 to July 2018.

arrow