A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From September 16, 2016, around 03:30 on September 16, 2016, the Defendant discovered a bank that the victim C left on his/her table in the rest room of “E K Kinging practice room” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and followed the said bank by using the gaps in which there is no victim C, and then carried 10,000 won of gift certificates 10,000 won of gift certificates 3 owned by the victim C, one copy of SSK card, one resident registration certificate, etc.

The defendant, in addition to this, he had three cellular phones and three cellular phones in the above resting room over six times in total, such as in the list of crimes in the attached list.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property.

2. On September 20, 2016, around 13:30 on September 20, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents stating “C” in the subscriber name column, “H” in the subscriber name column, “H” and “Gangbuk-gu I” in the subscriber name column, and signed “C” in the applicant/subscriber name column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for membership of a radio operator in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as indicated in paragraph 2, exercised the following: (a) as if he had duly formed a forged application for membership of a telecommunications company with the said G employeesJ, who knew of such forgery.

4. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, at the same time, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 2, presented to the above J a forged application for admission of a radio operator and the Defendant’s resident registration certificate that the Defendant stolen to the above J, and committed as if he had a legitimate authority to open a mobile phone in his name.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the above J, opened a gallon S7 mobile phone owned by the victim G from the above J, and was given delivery of it, but the said J was the Defendant.