logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.08.20 2019고단1491
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 16:35 on August 29, 2018, the Defendant took a dynamic image of approximately one minute on the part of the injured women who suffered from a short string horse with a view to waiting for subways around the platform in the 3333 sperm stations, using the Defendant’s smartphone camera.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a camera, against his will.

2. On December 9, 2018, around 22:30 on December 22, 2018, the Defendant reported a female suffering from a short 100 Monopoly mar, whose name cannot be known within the 100 foot history, according to the sanct of the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and took a video image of about 10 seconds using the Defendant’s smartphone camera to the part of the bridge in the victim’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a camera, against his will.

3. On December 24, 2018, the Defendant, around 12:00 to 13:00 on December 24, 2018, tried to enter in advance the body of a woman who is viewed as being melted in the body of a female at the 2nd female female toilet of the Jung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, in order to affix the body of the female who is viewed as being melted in the 2nd female seat C, and the victim’s name in secret was known that the female under the victim’s name was melting in the front section of the defendant’s side, and exceeded the upper part of the victim’s bridge, who is viewed as being melting the upper part of the upper part of the bar, and to sum up the upper part of the damaged female’s bridge, but the crime was not committed due to the noise at the time of pressing operation, and it did not constitute an attempted crime.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to take the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a camera, against his will, and attempted to take the body of the victim against his will.

4. The crime committed around December 28, 2018 is identical to the above three paragraphs between around 12:00-13:00 and around December 28, 2018.

arrow