2019Nu40316 Disposition of revocation of reprimand

A

Law Firm continental Aju, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

[Defendant-Appellee]

The Minister of Education

Government Legal Service Corporation (Law Firm LLC)

Attorney Kim Jae-chul

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2018Guhap74525 decided March 3, 2019

August 30, 2019

October 4, 2019

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's reprimand disposition against the plaintiff on February 5, 2018 shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasons why this Court shall be stated are as follows: (a) the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the second instance judgment, in addition to the fact that the 15th "......." in the 6th letter of the second instance judgment was used as " December 19, 2014" in the 15th letter of the 6th instance judgment; and (b) thus, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

2. Conclusion

The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

The presiding judge, appointed judge;

Judges Lee Jae-chul

Judges Kim Gin-han