beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 13, 2015, the Defendant stolen at night buildings: (a) via the open entrance of “Csing practice hall” located in Gumi-si B on November 13, 2015; (b) 3,000 won in cash owned by the victim D; (c) 10,000 won in traditional traditional markets; (d) 1 copy of driver’s license; (e) 1 copy of resident registration certificate; and (e) 1 copy of Korean card in the name of E, the husband of the said victim; and (e) 30,000 won in the market price of Hyundai Card.
2. Violation of Acts in financial business specializing in fraud and credit finance;
A. On November 13, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at around 01:05, Nov. 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) demanded around 01:05 on Nov. 13, 2015, the Defendant used the stolen credit card by forcing the victim to pay the price by the said credit card; (b) having the victim pay KRW 3,300 on a taxi in front of G, while paying KRW 3,300 to the taxi in front of G, the Defendant used the stolen credit card to deny use by having the victim pay the price by the said credit card; and (c) having the victim pay the price by the said credit card.
B. On November 13, 2015, around 01:18, the same day, the Defendant, at around 01:18, paid KRW 30,00,00 for accommodation expenses from “Jel” operated by the victim I located in Si/Gu, Gu, Si, Si, si, and caused the victim to pay the price by the said credit card, as described in paragraph (1), by suggesting the victim’s modern card under the name of E, which was stolen, to use the stolen credit card unlawfully, and by allowing the victim to pay the price by the said credit card. The Defendant took property profits
(c)
On November 13, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at around 01:35, 01:00 on the same day, and around 01:35, the Defendant loaned 1.30,000 won to the above victim. The Defendant, as indicated in paragraph 1, presented the victim’s modern card under the name of E, which was stolen, as if the Defendant was owned by the Defendant, and had the victim settle 1.30,000 won by the said credit card, thereby illegally using the stolen credit card, and from the victim’s settlement amount.