Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a professor of C University infant in C University operated by the injured school foundation B.

On September 2017, the Defendant had an interview with the public prosecution other than the reporters belonging to E broadcasting stations in the B, E in the B, U.S. in the B, U.S. in the B, U.S. D located in the B, U.S., the Defendant provided “F reporters recruited young children’s education and professors at C, 201,” and 14 of them subsequently passed the interview.

At the time, G's document review research performance scores were 8, etc. (500%) from among 14 applicants, but two persons were elected as visitors.

Of the two interviews, G receives 92.5 points out of 100 points from the interview and receives 55 points from the interview.

“Along with the explanation to the effect that it is, and continuously, “Along with how the interview score is so about 40 parts.”

If a person wishing to be selected within the Republic of Korea shows an interview to the effect that the interview score difference between the interview score and that it should be given, on September 28, 2017, the Ewn broadcasted on the news, including the above interview content, as if there was no objection in the education of young children at C University in 2011 and the employment of professors.

However, in fact, the Defendant, as the head of the first document review group in 201, participated in the number of three of the examiners of the first document review group as the head of education for young children and new professors in 201, and was well aware of the teaching employment procedure. 2) The document review for the applicants for the appointment of professors is about 30 points out of 100 points, and among them, "the quantitative evaluation of research achievements (the total research achievements)" is about 30 points in weight, "the qualitative evaluation of research achievements (20 points)," "the evaluation of basic capabilities as professors (35 points)," and "the evaluation of basic capabilities as professors (15 points)" were calculated, and the average score value of three examiners of the document review table is the final document review point, and 3) actually, the document review table for the Defendant India is prepared and total points of 94 points.