logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.15 2015고단4772
저작권법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Professors, the professor of K University Fire-Fighting College, Defendant B, the professor of the Fire-Fighting Safety Management of L University, and Defendant C, the professor of the major department inside the M University, and the professor of the Fire-Fighting Safety Engineering of the O University.

1. On November 2012, Defendant A submitted to the person in charge of evaluating the achievements of faculty members of the K University as a faculty member in the year 2012, indicating Q as the author, although the Defendant was the author and the author was not the author, and Q as the author was written on March 2, 2012, as if Q was the Defendant’s author, as the author was written in the original report, to the person in charge of evaluating the achievements of faculty members of the K University in the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the evaluation of the achievements of faculty members of K University (including all evaluations and examinations that are utilized in the evaluation of their achievements, such as reappointment, promotion, retirement age guarantee, payment of research expenses, selection of faculty members of research year, selection of outstanding faculty members of research achievements, reward, etc.) by fraudulent means.

2. In February 2013, Defendant B submitted a letter of “R” issued on September 10, 2010 by Q as a professor to the person in charge of the evaluation of the reappointment of teaching staff of L University as a professor in the above office on September 10, 2014, even though the Defendant was not an author at the private university office located in the Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant indicated Q as a professor, as the Defendant’s author, and submitted the letter of “R” issued on September 10, 2014 as a teaching evaluation document, and submitted it to the person in charge of the evaluation of the reappointment of teaching staff of L University as the Defendant’s author, on September 10, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the evaluation of the reappointment of professors of L University by deceptive means.

3. On September 2010, Defendant C indicated the Defendant as his official seal even when the Defendant was not the author at the National University Office, a National University, located in Telecommunication, inasmuch as he was not the author.

arrow