beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
The Defendants did not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a professor of K University L, Defendant B, and Defendant C, respectively, who was employed as a professor of N University located in Yangyang-si in Seoul, Yangyang-si, and P, as a business employee of Q and R in May 2014 while serving as a business employee of Q and R.
1. On August 2012, Defendant A, at the office of the Korea University Health and Science University, printed the first printing of P from P on April 1, 2007, and then published at that time, Defendant A was granted the first letter of “X” in the so-called “X” letter published on August 20, 2012 by changing the title to “X” and then submitted the said letter of “X” to the person in charge of evaluating the achievements of the faculty members of the Korea University as a teacher’s evaluation data.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the evaluation of the achievements of faculty members of K University (including all evaluations and examinations that are utilized in the evaluation of their achievements, such as reappointment, promotion, retirement age guarantee, payment of research expenses, selection of faculty members of research year, selection of outstanding faculty members of research achievements, promotion of salary class, and reward) by fraudulent means.
2. In September 2013, Defendant B: (a) the Defendant was a Y’s copyrighted work and was not the author of “Z” published in R from March 10, 2010; (b) the Defendant changed the title “Z” to Defendant B, C, AA, AB, and AC as “AD”; and (c) changed the title “AD” to “AD”; and (d) submitted the so-called “marked” book issued in R from September 10, 2010 to the person in charge of evaluating the achievements of N University faculty members as the Defendant’s author’s work and submitted the report of their achievements to the person in charge of evaluating the achievements of N University faculty members in 2013.
Accordingly, the defendant evaluated his achievements as a deceptive scheme (re-election, promotion, guarantee of retirement age, payment of research expenses, selection of teaching staff for research year, and selection of outstanding teaching staff for research achievements).