logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.05.08 2013고정93
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million and by a fine of KRW 3 million, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A had worked as the Director General of the Editorial Office for D Reading Newspapers for about five years.

E was a member of the F church, and victims G, and H were the members of the above church, and victims I, J, K, L, M, N, andO were the heads of the above church.

E Warmans had been engaged in the activities of the FIO as a FIO member of the FIO in around 2007, but the church believerss divided into so-called ‘P' and ‘ Q Q', which are opposite to E in connection with the suspicion of embezzlement, etc. of E pastors.

Q sought friendship by creating a camera called “R” on the Internet portal site’s “the following,” and the Defendant posted it in the above camera, stating that he and the victims embezzled the church money.

After that, Q filed a complaint with E by asserting that it had committed embezzlement and breach of trust by private use of church funds. However, on December 12, 201, the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office rendered a decision on "no suspicion" at the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, which was appealed, but on February 7, 2012, the Seoul High Public Prosecutor's Office rendered a decision on "Dismissal of Appeal" on February 7, 2012.

Therefore, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant’s assertion that he embezzled the church money after December 2, 201, on which the above decision was made and the written decision was served, was false or insufficient to prove the lack of evidence.

Nevertheless, the Defendant published the reputation published in the above car page as “S” book, and then, on February 15, 2012, distributed it to many and unspecified members on the Flux in Seoul Northern-gu T, Seoul, and damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts through publications for the purpose of slandering victims.

The specific contents of the Defendant’s defamation act are as follows.

The Defendant, on the 13th page, write the king, written by E, “E” as the title “E well-being the funeral in his house.”

arrow