A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 26, 2015, around 00:35, the Defendant discovered the Defendant, who was under influence of alcohol, at the front side of the port B, a slope D, belonging to the Ponding Police Station C commander of the Ponding Police Station, called “the male who was under influence of alcohol,” discovered the Defendant, and tried to do so by assaulting and verbal abuse, such as “the Defendant, who was frightened, frighted, frighted at the house, frighten, frighted, frighted at the house,” and who was asked to ask him of the circumstances. The Defendant tried to do so by assaulting and verbal abuse, such as “the frightend, frighted, frighted, frighted, frighted at one time,” and “the frightd, frighted, frighted at the bar of the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers D to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (Consideration to the degree of damage by police officers, the fact that it appears to be a contingent crime while in operation, and the fact that there is no same kind

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;