1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff was appointed as Staff sergeant and served as a three-minute search register for the first unit search for the first unit search for the 17th group B from October 19, 2016 to the present.

B. On November 1, 2017, the Defendant, following the deliberation and resolution by the disciplinary committee, took a one-month disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s grounds for disciplinary action are recognized as follows (hereinafter “instant measure”).

1. Violation of the duty to maintain dignity (Language Violence) - Before June 2017, - one’s police officer C with a view to “whether or not he/she does not want to work, going out and going out, and is subject to leave control,” and “I do not have any respect or flaps, and humbing,” and “I do not have any blag, and humbing.”

m. - During the period of shock training conducted from September 4, 2017 to September 8, 2017, during which one’s disease D was fluorized by verbal abuse, such as “Iss to move well,” “Ish,” “Ish,” “Ish,” “Ish,” “Ish, Ish,” and “Ish, Ish, Isn if Ish, Isn, Isn the three major teachers, “Ish, Ish, Ish, Ish, Ish, Isn, Ish, Isn, Isn, Ish, Isn, Ish, Ish, Isn.”

In order to view a film between the latter and the latter, on September 24, 2017, the Security Regulations, Article 115 of the Personal Information and Communications Network Regulation, which prohibits entry and use, were introduced without permission, and the system management regulations of the information and communications system were violated by without permission. In addition, it was found that there was a violation of the security regulations of the Ministry of Information and Communications System, which is prohibited from entry and use in accordance with the control of personal information and communications equipment.

On November 10, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed against the instant disposition. However, the Army Chief of Staff (the Chief of Staff) filed an appeal.