beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant, as the representative director of corporation E established for the purpose of distributing steel materials in Gangseo-gu Busan, has overall control over the affairs of the company.
When supplying goods, a person who intends to conclude a contract for the supply of goods requiring safety grade with the Korea hydroelectric Energy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Atomic Energy Co., Ltd.") shall submit documents for quality assurance, such as a test report, etc. issued by a domestic or foreign testing institution which verifies that the relevant goods have been manufactured using parts meeting the specifications and materials required in Korea-U.S., and shall not supply all the goods unless there is any quality assurance document for the relevant specifications of individual parts.
1. Around 2008, the Defendant entered into a supply contract with Hanwon Co., Ltd., which entered into a supply contract for Hanwon’s 3 and 4 main facility works. The Defendant supplied steel materials.
From March 208 to October 2010, the Defendant, without authority, contained the test report form in the name of Sco special lecture in order to exercise the above office E office, and then, made a forgery of one copy of the test report (60109-2203) in the name of Sco special lecture (601-2203) by using a computer program called " Ptotop shop", and then arbitrarily recorded and output it. In addition, from March 2008 to October 201, the Defendant altered the test report more than 33 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes.
2. On December 2008, the Defendant: (a) issued a forged report on the use of the falsified special lecture name as if he were a document duly formed; and (b) used the forged report in December 2008, to an employee of the company Non-Afabab who was aware of the fact at the office of the company, Hafaba in the name of the company, Hafa, Hafa in the name of the company.