logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.23 2014고단2304
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant entered the defense industry company (State) C on August 16, 1993 and worked as the chief of the quality management team from around August 2008 to August 25, 201, and was in charge of product quality control.

(State)Around February 21, 2011,C entered into a purchase agreement with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration to supply for KRW 347,489,075, a single unit of elntain, which is a part of the dynamics (ship). On March 21, 201, the Defendant requested the Defense Acquisition Program Administration to verify the quality of the product in the Defense Technology and Quality Agency on March 201.

The Defendant asked D’s employees in charge of inspection to submit a test report for the publication of polymathy, which is one of the constituent parts of LIE, from D’s employees in charge of inspection, to the KIE’s request for a test report for the issuance of the test report to E(State), which is a supplier of LIE, who is a supplier of LIE. However, the Defendant asked F to submit a test report for the issuance of the test report to E(State), but was given the answer that the Defendant could not receive the test report from the F as there was no domestic authorized testing institution that can analyze polymathy

The defendant was unable to issue the inspection report and supply report to the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance, and the Defense Acquisition Program Administration is unable to deliver the report to the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance. Therefore, the defendant conspired the test report to submit it to the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance.

1. On March 29, 2011, the Defendant: (a) requested the head of HIT testing and research institute in G to send a test report file in the name of the head of HIT testing and research institute in the name of the head of HIT test and research institute to the vice head I at the office located in G at the time of Gyeonggi-si; and (b) on March 30, 201, the requester at the office around 08:25, the applicant was sent a file of the test report in the name of the head of the FIT testing and research institute in the name of the J company ( Address: Seoul Eunpyeong-gu KK) on February 26, 2010.

On March 30, 2011, the Defendant is in the name of the president of the FITI Examination and Research Institute on February 26, 201, at the above-mentioned (C office) office at the time of non-payment.

arrow