A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as a representative of D established for the purpose of distribution business such as V in Changwon-si, has an overall control over the business affairs of the company.

When supplying goods, a person who intends to conclude a contract for the supply of goods requiring safety grade with the Korea hydroelectric Energy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Atomic Energy Co., Ltd.") shall submit documents for quality assurance, such as a test report, etc. issued by a domestic or foreign testing institution which verifies that the relevant goods have been manufactured using parts meeting the specifications and materials required in Korea-U.S., and shall not supply all the goods unless there is any quality assurance document for the relevant specifications of individual parts.

1. In around 2009, the Defendant forged private documents and concluded a supply contract with the Dualian who entered into a contract for the E main facility works of Hanwon, thereby allowing the Defendant to supply steel materials.

Around March 2009, the Defendant, without authority, forged the F’s test report on the F’s name (“F”) by copying and reproducing the number and English necessary in the F’s name description column, name column, size column, and English, without authority, and then reproducing the test report on the following occasions. From that time to November 201, the Defendant forged the test report on a total of 21 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached list, from that time, until November 201.

2. Around March 2009, the Defendant exercised the forged test report on a total of 21 occasions as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table from that time to December 2010, 2009, in the office of Sabya, located in the territory of the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, at the office of the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, issued the falsified test report to an employee of the Republic of Korea, who is not aware of the fact, as if it were a document duly formed.

3. The Defendant, around April 30, 2009, was the victim at the above D office, and by the above method.