1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) D High Schools (hereinafter “instant schools”)

(2) On March 1, 2007, Defendant B opened to an open autonomous school and was designated as an autonomous public high school on or around 2010. The Plaintiff was appointed as a visiting teacher of the instant school under the Chungcheongbuk-do Superintendent of the Provincial Office of Education, and served as a visiting teacher in the instant school from March 1, 2009. (2) Defendant B served as the principal of the instant school until February 22, 201, and Defendant C served as the principal of the instant school.

B. 1) On the other hand, the Plaintiff was in charge of the first year’s class curriculum while taking charge of the first year’s social curriculum in the year 2009, and the Plaintiff was in charge of the first year’s class teacher (hereinafter “school teacher”).

)로 근무하였으나, 2010학년도부터는 담임교사업무를 맡지 아니한 채 1학년 사회 교과수업 내지 3학년 경제 교과수업 등을 담당하였다. 2) 원고는 2012. 2. 21. 충청북도교육청 교육공무원 보통고충심사위원회에 이 사건 학교장이 2012학년도에 자신을 담임교사로 배정하지 않은 것은 위법부당하다는 취지로 고충심사를 청구하였으나, 위 보통고충심사위원회에서는 2012. 3. 28. 위 청구를 불인용하는 결정을 하였고, 이에 원고가 2012. 4. 4. 교육공무원 중앙고충심사위원회(교육공무원법 제49조 제3항에 따라 교원소청심사위원회에서 그 기능을 관장한다)에 재심을 청구하였으나, 교원소청심사위원회에서는 2012. 6. 4. 위 청구를 불인용하는 결정을 하였다.

3) In addition, while the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation with the Cheongju District Court seeking the revocation of the disposition of the exclusion of a fenced in the year 2012, the Plaintiff was sentenced to the dismissal judgment (Cheongju District Court Decision 2012Guhap1476, Mar. 28, 2013). C. 1) The Plaintiff proposed a proposal to be invited to the Plaintiff on July 11, 2012 by the school operation committee E, etc. of the instant school, and proposed a proposal to be invited to the Plaintiff on August 30, 2012.