logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.04.30 2013가합4325
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 3, 1974, the Plaintiff was a public educational official who was newly appointed as a middle school teacher in the Jeju-do, North Korea-U.S., and served in the C Middle School located in the Jeonju-si (hereinafter “instant school”) from March 1, 2010.

B. On April 2, 2012, parents E of D (hereinafter “victimed student”) who is a student of the instant school filed a civil petition with the Superintendent of the Jeollabuk-do Office of Education, on March 30, 2012, the victim student filed a civil petition against the Plaintiff on the ground that he/she was her head, buck, etc., and was unable to participate in the class on the ground that he/she was written an anti-

C. Accordingly, on April 2, 2012, on the day when the pertinent civil petition was filed, the office of education conducted a civil petition investigation at the audit office of the Jeollabuk-do Office of Education on April 9, 2012, and on April 10, 2012. Based on the result of the investigation on the above civil petition, the superintendent of education of Jeollabuk-do requested a disciplinary decision against the Plaintiff to the General Disciplinary Committee of the Public Educational Officials in Jeollabuk-do (hereinafter “Disciplinary Committee”) on April 12, 2012; on May 30, 2012, the disciplinary committee decided to “three months in suspension from office” against the Plaintiff on the following grounds (hereinafter “the ground for the original disposition”), and notified the Plaintiff of the said disciplinary disposition on June 12, 2012.

The plaintiff did not discipline a student as prescribed by the law and school regulations, but did not cause physical harm to the student's body and respect the student's personality by 4 times the student's head, and brea the student's personality. From 200 to 300, the student's right of learning was infringed by preventing a student from participating in the class on the ground of anti-written statement from participating in the class. On the same day, the student did not fulfill his/her duty of taking classes for about 20 minutes on the ground of the student guidance in the first and second grade classes at the third grade classes at the same time, and the student's civil petition against a female student who uses his/her lineal ascendant or descendant or his/her non-human body punishment was filed, thereby impairing the teacher's dignity.

arrow