logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.01.21 2014구합417
해임처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on September 9, 2013 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on January 29, 1994, and was promoted to a slope on June 1, 2007, and served at the Gunsan Police Station B box from September 3, 2011.

B. On September 9, 2013, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 57 (Duty of Good Faith), 59 (Duty of Kind and Impartiality), and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act as follows (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

1. Neglecting duties;

A. On June 10, 2013, at around 12:15, the Plaintiff neglected to perform duties in violation of a legitimate order, such as making up approximately 10 minutes of the patrol vehicle without taking any measures, even though he was ordered by the police box reduction E to conduct search and seizure of the apartment unit No. 112, after having called the scene to the 112 string of the apartment unit No. 3 located in the military, the Plaintiff neglected to perform duties in violation of a legitimate order, such as holding the 10 minutes of the patrol vehicle.

B. On June 10, 2013, around 15:00 on June 10, 2013, the Plaintiff received a report of the occurrence of a traffic accident from the food distance located in the Gun film-dong, Gun film-si, and dispatched it

Although the head of the team at the time F and Assistant G were on-site measures and traffic control, the Plaintiff neglected to perform his/her duties, such as leaving the scene on the side of the patrol vehicle parked at approximately 30 meters away from the scene, and failing to take any measures.

C. On June 10, 2013, at around 16:00, the Plaintiff reported that there had occurred a change in the H apartment subsequent to the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, and dispatched it to the site.

At the time, the head of the team F and Assistant G were assigned to the bereaved family members, and the head of the team at the time, and the head of the team at the time, for one hour and 30 minutes, such as contact with the food team. However, the Plaintiff neglected to perform his/her duties, such as being seated on the patrol vehicle parked far after about 100 meters away from the scene of the changeer.

The plaintiff is the military police station from September 3, 201 to August 23, 2013.

arrow