logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.04.27 2019고단1731
모욕
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2019, at around 02:12, the Defendant received 112 reporting that the Defendant did not calculate the drinking value at a Dice D located in the Si of Masan City, and recommended the Victim F of the Military Police Station Eaccom, who was dispatched to the site, to calculate the drinking value and to return home, the Defendant provided several abusives: (a) the Defendant sent to the victim of the Diplomatic Police Station Eaccom affiliated with the Gun Police Station Eaccom affiliated with the Gun Police Station Eaccom affiliated with the Sinsan Police Station, and (b) the victim before C, “this son is still working,” “this bomb,” “this bomb,” “this flaps,” “new flaps,” “police quality,” “new flaps,” and “sick flags.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement related to G and H;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment (see, e.g., the fact that the crime of this case is recognized and reflected, the fact that there exists a record of punishment for the same obstruction of performance of official duties, the fact that the crime is inferior to the crime committed against police officers in the course of performing official duties,

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act

1. At around 02:12 on August 13, 2019, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant sent a report of 112 statement to the 10-ro 10 and D, the 10-ro 10 and the 112-ro 10 of the Sinsan City, and recommended the victim Nonparty B belonging to the Sinsan Police Station Emba, who was dispatched to the site, to calculate the drinking value and return to the country; (b) the Defendant expressed a desire for the Defendant to read “this son’s still flab,” “this flab,” “this flab,” “this flab,” “new flab,” “this flab,” and “sick flab” to the victim before the scene.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to complaint:

arrow