logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.09.05 2018구합70226
징계처분취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 3, 1994, the Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on May 20, 201, and was promoted to the police officer on May 20, 201, and served in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Agency B police station (hereinafter “B police station”) from February 4, 2015 to October 27, 2017.

Police officers shall observe all relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, perform their duties faithfully, and shall not perform any act detrimental to their dignity.

A person subject to B police station female youth and work, 1) in the case of missing female children (C in the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the C, 14 years of age, 14 years of age, and 10 years of age), refers to the case of killing F and abandoning the body of F on October 1, 2017.

On September 30, 2017, around 23:21, the general situation room neglected to take the initial measures for the missing case against the minor, including: (a) sleeping slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking slicking sl.

B. On November 15, 2017, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Provincial Police Agency General Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers violates Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity) and 63 (Duty of Good Faith) of the State Public Officials Act, and thus, Article 78 (1) 1, 2, and 3 of the same Act.

arrow