1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On October 11, 1997, the Plaintiff was appointed as a patrol officer, and served as a secondary guard and an expressway patrol officer from February 1, 2016 to May 12, 2019.

On June 21, 2019, the Defendant neglected the duty of the patrol vehicle to drive approximately 8 km in the vicinity of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant accident”) around 15:30 on April 25, 2019, and neglected the duty of the patrol vehicle to drive the vehicle at a point (hereinafter referred to as the “U.S.”) 83.8km located in the Mine-dong, Gwangju Metropolitan City (U.S.), and neglected the duty of the patrol vehicle to stop the engine engine operation, to separate the keys from the vehicle, and to prevent theft, such as locking the vehicle, and to stop the vehicle, and to stop the vehicle, and to stop the duty of the police official for the first time and at the same place (hereinafter referred to as “the first time patrol vehicle”), and delayed the duty of the police official on the ground that the police official’s first time and on the ground that there was an unlawful violation of the regulations, such as the suspension of duty of the police official, and delayed the duty of the police official on the ground that it was unlawful.

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the above disciplinary action and filed an appeal review with the appeals review committee, and the appeals review committee changed the disciplinary action of one month of suspension from office on September 5, 2019 to three months of salary reduction.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant disposition”, which was mitigated for three months of reduction of salary, was mitigated on June 21, 2019. [The grounds for recognition] 【No dispute exists, each entry of Gap’s 1 through 3, 11, Eul’s 5 through 9, and 22 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s entire purport of pleading, cannot take measures, such as suspending the engine of patrol vehicles, in order to prevent secondary accidents on the expressway.