(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.12.01 2017구합57363

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.12.01 2017구합57363

견책처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a police officer working at B police station investigation and intelligence criminal investigation team.

B. On August 9, 2016, the Defendant issued a reprimand against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”) pursuant to Article 78(1)1, 2, and 3 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff neglected to accept and investigate the report of damage, failing to immediately commence the investigation, etc. despite being ordered by the situation management officer as follows, and violated Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 57 (Duty of Good Faith), and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act.

On June 10, 2016, the Plaintiff moved to his/her father-gu at this time the sound that his/her father is leading to sexual assault and sexual traffic. On the same day, the Plaintiff reported to his/her husband-child's criminal investigation team at B police station B police station (hereinafter referred to as "nive team") on the same day. At present, he/she again returned to the present day. The receipt of the 112 report (Case No. 11590) report (Case No. 11590) that "I are going to come to the scene of sexual assault. I are going to go to the scene of sexual assault." The Plaintiff received the case from the local police station, and sought from B police station situation management officer E to explain the overall case, and suggested that "It is reasonable to investigate it in the front team." However, even if he/she did not immediately receive the report from the intelligence investigation team (hereinafter referred to as "intelligent investigation team") on the ground that he/she did not immediately receive the report of damage from the minor (the report of this case).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of whole pleadings

2. To make entries in the attached statutes concerned;

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (i.e., the situation management officer at the intelligence team).

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2019.09.05 2018구합70226

-대구고등법원 2017.06.02 2016누5403

-대구지방법원 2016.05.24 2016구합20069

-서울행정법원 2019.05.10 2018구합6249

-서울행정법원 2019.05.10 2018구합6126