logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고단1754
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. Specific facts charged [2013 Height 1754] A violation of the vehicle operation restriction [2013 Height 1755] around June 2, 2006 by a defendant's employee [2013 Height 1755] A's violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 20:50 on February 17, 200 of the defendant's employee [2013 Height 1756] A's violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 16:02 on March 8, 200 of the defendant's employee [203 Height 1757] A's violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 16: 200 on September 16: 13, 198 by the defendant's employee / [203 Height 1758 on June 16, 2019]

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow