logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.10.30 2013고단3420
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction around November 22, 200 - around 15:16, 200 on the charge specified [2013 Height3422] - A violation of vehicle operation restriction at around 13:28 on November 22, 2003 by C, who is an employee of the government support of the Seoul District Court, approximately 33444 defendant, the government support of the Seoul District Court at around 2:2:3:28 on November 13:2, 2003 of C, who is an employee of the defendant, [2013 Height3424] - Government District Court 2007 Height626 defendant's employee of the Government District Court at around 06:06 on November 22, 2006

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow