logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.21 2014고단1037
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. Details of the facts charged [the summary order subject to review: the District Court 2014 Go-Ma1037- Decided January 5, 2005 : the District Court 2004 Go-Ma32627 dated October 27, 2004 ] A violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 12:58 on October 27, 2004 (the summary order subject to review: about 2002 Go-Ma49762 dated December 26, 2002: the District Court / [a summary order subject to review: approximately 2002 Go-Ma49762 dated September 27, 2002] A violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 15:30 on September 27, 2002 by the defendant's employee [a violation of the vehicle operation restriction around September 14, 200 the Seoul District Court / [a summary order: approximately 200 on September 14, 2000)

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow