The defendant is innocent.

1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction around November 16, 2007, 2007, which is the defendant's employee, [2013 Height2116] A violation of vehicle operation restriction around November 26, 2007, / [2013 Height2117] of E- on April 14, 2006, which is the defendant's employee, / [2013 Height2118] A violation of vehicle operation restriction around January 31, 200 of F, which is the defendant's employee,

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.