The defendant is innocent.

Punishment of the crime

1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction around February 8, 2002 by a defendant's employee on February 8, 2002, which is specified in the facts charged [the summary order subject to the review 2013 Go-Ma4270- Re-deliberation: the Government's branch court of the Seoul District Court 2002 Go-Ma16727] A's violation of vehicle operation restriction around February 23, 2002 by the defendant's employee [the summary order subject to the re-deliberation : the Government's branch court of the Seoul District Court 2003 Go-Ma16712] A's violation of vehicle operation restriction around April 19, 203

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.