A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten years.

One cell phone (No. 2) and one set of Nowon-gu (No. 3) from the seized cell phone, respectively.

B. The Defendant received KRW 1,515,00,000 from the injured party for a loan and received a total of KRW 1,515,00 from around 12 times to February 17, 2015, as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes, including the receipt of KRW 1.8 million from the injured party for a loan.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

13. C-related crimes;

A. On November 28, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document by means of a computer at the AP certified brokerage office located in Heak-gu AO in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and by means of the computer at the location column of the lease contract form, the Defendant entered “Seoul-gu Agu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Qu Building 508” in the area column of land, “3714.5 square meters” in the size column, “5 square meters in the size column of land,” “508 square meters in the entire area,” “24.27 square meters in the leased area column,” “one million won (15,000,000), one million won (15,000,000), and one million won (15,000,000, and one another) in the name of the Defendant***10,014, the name of the Defendant****10,01, the name of the apartment***** 14,014.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the lease agreement in the name of AT, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On November 28, 2014, the Defendant exercised the aforementioned investigation document by presenting the forged lease agreement to the Defendant’s female-friendly job offering C, who was aware of the forgery in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Asttel Office, as if the document was a document duly formed.

(c)

1) The Defendant displayed the forged lease agreement with the victim C at the time, time, and place described in Section 4-b. The Defendant entered into an agreement with the victim for the officetel Q Q Q Q 508 at KRW 15 million, and the Defendant prepared for the 10 million amount, thereby incurring KRW 5 million by N.N.

“A false representation was made.”

However, it is true that the defendant is the owner of the above officetel in the amount of KRW 3 million, monthly rent of KRW 470,000.