logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.30 2017고단2318
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Cheongju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 28, 2014 at the Cheongju Prison.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 2318, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Dok-gu, the 2017 Highest 2318, sentenced the third party to arbitrarily rent the real estate of the 3rd et al. (D, E, and F).

1. Counterfeiting and uttering of private documents (related to contracts withG);

A. On October 4, 2016, the Defendant stated “B” as “A lessor: (a) using a fence in the form of a “housing Lease Contract” in order to enter into a sub-lease contract with G that knew of the fact that the Defendant, despite having not been entrusted with the authority to dispose of the land of Seocho-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoju-si, and the Defendant entered “J” in the resident registration number column, “K” in the resident registration number column, and “B” in the name of the said B, and was previously kept in custody following the name of the said B.

B his seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the lease contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant forged and possessed the rental agreement as referred to in paragraph (a) in advance. On October 4, 2016, at the same place as (a) around October 4, 2016, the Defendant exercised the forged housing lease agreement as if it was duly formed.

2. Forgery and uttering of private documents (related to a contract with L);

A. On October 4, 2016, the Defendant entered into a sub-lease contract with L and the above land in order to enter into a sub-lease contract with the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not have been delegated by the said B with the authority to dispose of the land of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, Seo-si, Seo-si, Seo-si, and the Defendant entered into the said contract into a sub-lease contract with L, which is aware of the fact.

arrow