A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2014, at around 20:40, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the person D in the C penta-gun, Gohap-gun, and sent to the Defendant, on the ground that he did not accept the Defendant’s demand for delivery from the reporter employee H and the reported person D during the process of the instant case, the Defendant: (b) her left hand and her arm’s clothes and arms in the G, on the ground that he did not listen to the circumstances of the case from the reporter employee H and D; and (c) her her arm’s clothes and arms, and (d) her her arm’s length and arms, “the name should be Chewing, her arm’s length, and the police officer’s ice,” and “I am and her frighte” to the F her head, and threatened the F her head by threatening him with her with her h’s eye as the latter’s h.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confessions, favorable circumstances such as the fact that there is no criminal record of probation or heavier for the latest thirty years);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] : Type 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties)