A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2015, around 23:23:23, the Defendant obstructed the legitimate execution of duties of the above G in relation to criminal investigation by destroying a 'D' store located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, with respect to the facts of assaulting street cleaners E without any justifiable reason, while he received 112 reports in relation to the facts of assaulting street cleaners E from the reporter of the F District G, who was sent to the F District G, sent to He himself. As he was subject to restraint from the above G, the Defendant was in the control of the victim by hand, and thereby interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the said G in relation to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to G and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties and coercion of official duties) (no person specially punished);

2. Determination of sentence of this case acknowledges and reflects the crime of this case, and there is no criminal record of the same kind and suspension of execution or more, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered.