1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, determination of issues, etc.) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of determining issues in accordance with the appellate court’s methods and principles, laws, precedents, legal principles and rules of evidence based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the court of first instance.

The reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for a decision on additional matters alleged by the Plaintiff as the reason for appeal, as set forth in paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) below. Thus, this Court cited this case as it is included in summary pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. (a) In the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, all of the Section 2, Section 1, Section 2, Section 1, Section 2, Section 1, Section 1, and Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3, Section 3, Section 4, Section 3, Section 4, Section 3, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 1,

(b) Nos. 2 and 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance and “National Bank of the Co., Ltd.” shall be incorporated into “National Bank of the Co., Ltd.”.

(c) If the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2, No. 16 and 17, “H” and “H” et al. shall be used as “HABA” and “H” (hereinafter “H”) shall be deleted.

(d) Nos. 13 and 17 of the first instance judgment (1. b.) shall be followed as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

B. On November 28, 2013, the Plaintiff, Defendant B, and D entered into a contract for trust of the instant land with the KHAC representative director (hereinafter “instant trust contract”).

Of the instant land on November 29, 2013, the Plaintiff, Defendant B, and D completed each registration of ownership transfer with respect to the Plaintiff’s share 154/1,093, Defendant B’s share 447/1,093, and D’s share 492/1,093, and thereafter, the instant land was based on the instant trust agreement to HAB Co., Ltd., a trustee on the same day.