1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Acknowledgement and conclusion of the first instance judgment

A. Based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, fact-finding, arguments and issues) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of determining issues in accordance with the appellate court’s methods and principles, laws, precedents, legal principles, and evidence rules.

The reasoning of this Court concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for cases of cutting or deleting as described in paragraph (2) below. Thus, the reasoning of this Court is as follows.

B. If so, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants should be dismissed in entirety as there is no reasonable ground.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in its conclusion, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

2. Part I written or deleted in column 2, Nos. 10 to 11, “Cos Korea Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Spets Korea” and “Inspets Korea” generated therefrom, all, shall be deemed to be “Inspets Korea” and “Defendant Inspets Korea” (hereinafter “Defendant inspets Korea”) shall be deleted in the same section.

No. 12 of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Loki") shall all be filled by the "Rovis" and "Rovis" from the "Rovis" to the "Rovis", and the same section 12 to 13 of the same section (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Lovis") shall be deleted.

On the 3rd 4-5th 1st eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.g.).

No. 6th page 6, "The plaintiff's claim for the allocation of the property of the association" shall be accepted as "the plaintiff's claim for the refund of equity shares".

Part 8, 1 to 20 (the whole ".......................") shall be completed as follows:

C. Part 1 of the claim for share refund is a relevant legal doctrine.