1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport 1.1.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, determination of issues, etc.) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of determining issues in accordance with the appellate court’s methods and principles, laws, precedents, legal principles and rules of evidence based on the litigation materials and the pleading materials submitted to the appellate court citing the judgment

The reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for this Court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for further determination as to the matters alleged by the plaintiff as the grounds for appeal, as described in paragraph (2) below, and as such, the reasoning for this Court shall be cited in the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

2. The part of the judgment of the first instance court, "A" and "A" generated from the first instance judgment No. 2, No. 15, "A" and "A" shall be adjusted to "A" and "A" and the same conduct (hereinafter referred to as "A") shall be deleted.

No. 3 of the judgment of the first instance court of the Minister of Education, Science and Technology, the "F" and "F" generated from the "F" shall be used as "F" and the same "F" shall be deleted.

The first instance judgment No. 4, No. 9, 10 of the first instance judgment and “L” generated from both the “stock company L” and “L” shall be used as “L” and the “L” shall be deleted from the same side of the first instance judgment.

(1) On June 30, 2017, the first instance court's first instance court's second 4th 20th " June 30, 2016" applied to " June 30, 2017".

Part 4 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance in e.g., M Co., Ltd. and “M” generated from the judgment of the court of first instance in e.g., “M Co., Ltd.” and “M Co., Ltd.” shall be referred to as “M Co., Ltd.” and the deletion of “M Co., Ltd.”

⒡ 제1심판결 제10면 제2행 내지 제3행 “갑 제1호증, 을 제3, 18, 19호증의 각 기재”를 “갑 제1, 9, 10, 11, 12호증, 을 제3, 18, 19, 22, 23호증(가지번호 있는 것은 각 가지번호 포함)의 각 기재”로 고쳐 쓴다.

⒢ 제1심판결 제11면 제4행 “상당히 미달한다.”...