1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, determination of issues, etc.) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of determining issues in accordance with the appellate court’s methods and principles, laws, precedents, legal principles and rules of evidence based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the court of first instance.

The reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for a decision on additional matters alleged by the defendant as the reason for appeal, as set forth in paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) below. Thus, this Court cited this case as it is included in summary pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. (a) Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance: (a) No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, all of the 2nd "Erogs Co., Ltd." and the erogs Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "erogs") shall be used as "Arogsa" and the same erogs" shall be deleted.

(b) No. 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, the Seoul Mutual Savings Bank Co., Ltd. and its “Seoul Savings Bank” (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Mutual Savings Bank”) shall be used as “Seoul Mutual Savings Bank,” and the same conduct (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Savings Bank”) shall be deleted.

(c) If the judgment of the court of first instance is in 2nd, 17 through 18, the term “the Formal Savings Bank” and “the Formal Savings Bank” are all used as “the Formal Savings Bank” and the term “the Formal Savings Bank” are deleted from the same 18th (hereinafter “Formal Savings Bank”).

(d) On the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, he shall use the ero financing system in the second page 19 as “limited company” and “ero financing system”, and shall delete the same ero financing system (hereinafter “ero financing system”).

(e) No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance: (e) 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as e.g. e. e. i. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e