1. In accordance with the incidental appeal and expansion of the purport of the claim by this court, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, determination of issues, etc.) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of determining issues in accordance with the appellate court’s methods and principles, laws, precedents, legal principles and rules of evidence based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the court of first instance.

The reasons for this Court concerning this case are as follows: (a) the parts used by the Defendants as the reasons for appeal are further determined as to the matters asserted by the Defendants as the reasons for appeal, (b) the part newly determined with respect to the incidental appeal or expansion of claims by this Court, and (c) the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the first instance except for the part concerning the application for the return of provisional payment, such as paragraph (4) and paragraph (5). As such, this part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance shall

2. (a) On the 2nd page 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, all of the Defendant Company B and the Defendant B arising from the 2nd page 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be used as the “Defendant B” and the “Defendant B” shall be deleted from the “Defendant B” of the same 17 through 18th column (hereinafter “Defendant B”).

(b) On June 12, 2013, the court of first instance applied for temporary injunction against obstruction of business with the court of 2014Kahap246 and applied for temporary injunction against obstruction of business with the court of 2014Kahap246 and applied for temporary injunction against obstruction of business with the court of 2013Kahap165 and applied for temporary injunction against obstruction of business with the court of 2013Kahap165 on June 11, 2013.

(c) No. 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance (A), No. 21 of the judgment, "A 2 through 5, 26", "A 2 through 5, 26."

(d) No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance was written by inserting "B 1, 15, and 20" with "B 1, 15, and 20 each."

(e) On the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the 7th judgment "J's husband K" was added to "G's husbandO".

(f) On the 7th judgment of the court of first instance, "A 6 through 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 36, and 37" were written "A 6 through 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 36, and 37".

(g) No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "No. 7, 12, and 13" of No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be "No. 7, 12, and 13."