Seoul Western District Court 2012Na3039 ( October 24, 2013)

The lawsuit of this case in which the purport of the claim cannot be specified because it is unclear is unlawful.

Even if the Plaintiff’s written complaint, brief, etc. and the Plaintiff’s legal statement are integrated, the purport of the claim is unclear, and it cannot be identified as the cause of the claim, such as the source of claim and the basis of calculation of the amount, etc.

2013Da202618 Compensation, etc.

KimA

Three Gangwon-gu et al.

Seoul Western District Court Decision 2012Na30339 Decided January 24, 2013

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party.

All of the records of this case, the judgment of the court below, and the grounds of appeal by the appellant are examined, and it is clear that the grounds of appeal by the appellant fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final