1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. Determination as to the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit

A. The summary of the defense of this case is not only specified in the subject matter of the lawsuit of this case, but also constitutes abuse of the right of lawsuit, and thus, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful, and thus, the lawsuit of this case is deemed unlawful, and thus, blinine (Pinin ex officio with respect to the Defendants) was examined.

As to whether the subject matter of a lawsuit is specified, the Plaintiff sought the payment of money, performance of duty to correct value-added tax, delivery of goods and certificates subject to value-added tax, removal of the obstacle to the exercise of the right to correct value-added tax, and performance of duty to make a revised return, as stated in the purport of the claim. However, even if the Plaintiff’s written statement and the Plaintiff’s legal statement are integrated, it is unclear whether the purport of the claim is unclear or there is no legal basis in the case of the remaining claims except for a monetary claim, and even in the case of a monetary claim, the subject matter of the lawsuit in this case cannot be specified

C. As to the abuse of right of action