beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2013-Na-40218 ( January 13, 2017)
Title
(C) Revocation of fraudulent act and demand for payment of money
Summary
(1) The part of the claim for revocation of a fraudulent act is unlawful, and it is not unlawful because it is not possible to specify the subject matter of lawsuit with the claimant who seeks payment of money or fulfillment of obligations.
Related statutes
Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act
Cases
2017Da34882 Revocation of Fraudulent Act
Defendant-Appellant
aa
Plaintiff-Appellee
000
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court-2013-Na-40218 ( January 13, 2017)
Imposition of Judgment
November 09, 2017
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the appointed parties, including the plaintiff (appointed parties).
Reasons
Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.